So today I went to a town hall meeting given by Anna Eshoo my local congresswoman. It was mildly interesting, nothing very revealing, but she seemed nice, personable and approachable. She stuck to the party line on most issues, and showed she was committed to her principles on her most prominent issues, health care and consumer protections.
Here are some interesting notes I took on the meeting.
The most interesting thing that Anna said today was that Democrats are getting completely shut out of Congressional Conference Committees. It used to be even when Republicans held majorities in the House or Senate the Democrats would at least be invited to debate issues. The Democrats would frequently lose when the votes came up, but at least there was a reasonable debate going on. Now, the Democrats are not even invited to debate and she said that it’s a severe abuse of power. That is troublesome from a political point of view.
When asked about the problem of illegal immigration, she said she supported strengthened border enforcement. I’m not sure where exactly I stand on this issue, but it’s really a multi-tiered problem. The incentive to work in America is far too strong for immigrants to avoid smuggling themselves in. One solution is to a make it tougher to get it, another solution is to reduce the incentive to work in America. Americans have to accept that cheap agriculture and immigrant labor are almost inseparable. If we want to protect our jobs, there has to be an associated cost with doing so. We have to punish companies that hire illegal immigrants, and we have to accept that prices will be higher for doing so. I personally belive that punishing companies for using immigrants is more effective, but that’s harder to stomach politically. It’s also too easy for the whole issue to engender racism, which makes it touchier.
When asked about why gas prices in California were so high(roughly $.20/gal more than other states someone said), Eshoo pointed to a lack of competition in the gas market. I’m not sure where this comes from, and I tend to doubt it, I have no idea what would make the state so unfriendly to gas competition.
There were a lot of questions about medicare and fiscal policy. On Medicare, she was hopeful about upcoming reforms giving universal prescription drug coverage. I think this is one issue that’s again extremely difficult to solve. Maybe pharmaceuticals need to be regulated, maybe even taken from the private sector and bought out by the government. Something so dramatic will never happen, but something has to be done. Pharamceuticals have fought long and hard against any sort of price containment, but its time they looked at the huge profits and did something for the public. Eshoo was not all that enthused about allowing importation of prescription drugs from Canada, citing the impossibility of FDA regulation and enforcement when liability falls on non-US companies.
It used to be that the Republicans stood for fiscal responsibility and open markets. And when I look at the issue of prescription drug coverage, it’s hard to tell if this is an issue where Republicans are sticking to their principles of open markets, or they are actually caving to the special interests. I think this might be one of the reasons why the public perceives Republicans as too cozy with special interests. Taking money from special interests makes everyone think that they are just accepting money from their friends in big business. It’s possible that they want a small government that doesn’t pay for services to the public, but you can’t tell.
Also Eshoo cited the chipping away of the Clean Air Act as her most worrisome environmental issue. I have to strongly agree here. Not everyone agrees on the value of saving the whales or some other favorite mammal, but if you take away the Clean Air Act it’s a serious public health problem. She saw the new EPA administrator as another typical Bush appointee, a pro business person who won’t really be an advocate for the environment. That is quite a depressing way to describe the new head of the EPA.