Pro-Nukes or Anti-Nukes
I think of myself as an environmentalist, but I am in favor of nuclear power. It seems like an odd combination of policies to support, but I don’t think it is. To me, it’s an issue that divides how the environmental movement should take on todays challenges. I think it’s being unrealistic to constrain worldwide energy consumption to a level that can be maintained with renewable resources. In America and a few other modernized nations, it would be possible, but very difficult. However the bigger problem are the demands of rapidly industrializing countries like China and India. Those countries will not be able to a generate enough renewable energy sources for decades to come.
Yes nuclear power has challenges, waste disposal being the most daunting one. But it does have significant advantages which no other energy source has. It is clean(yes waste disposal aside) and causes no carbon emissions. It is available widely. It is cheap. No other power source can make those claims. Hydroelectric causes a wide variety of downriver and water rights issues. Solar is too expensive and is not usable everywhere. Wind has similar problems. Coal, oil and natural gas are not renewable and cause varying degrees of emissions.
Yes there is a chance of a Chernobyl type nuclear meltdowns, but the third generation pebble bed reactors are much safer than older designs.
Here’s an article which I just found via StumbleUpon that I agree with. I call myself a practical environmentalist.
It’s silly to prevent people from providing better lives for themselves and their children, it’s better to just take a reasoned approach and provide countries with a usable compromise rather than viewing everything as a black(coal/oil) and white(impractical renewables).
